A small annual percentage can become a meaningful dollar difference. Compare the estimated expense-ratio drag of IBIT, FBTC, GBTC and the tracked US spot Bitcoin ETFs over your holding period.
*Planning estimate, not a forecast. The model compounds the selected return annually, then applies each fund's expense ratio as a yearly drag. It isolates expense ratios and excludes waivers, brokerage costs, spreads, taxes and tracking differences.
Keep, switch or redirect future purchases
Three ways to compare your ETF costs.
Keep your existing fund, switch the holding, or keep it and direct new contributions to another fund. Compare the same cash budget under the same assumed gross return.
Before-tax model. Tax on a sale, tax deferral and eventual liquidation are excluded and may change the comparison substantially. The model also excludes tracking differences, fee changes, premium/discount changes and price movement during a switch. Results are hypothetical costs, not a fund recommendation.
Scenario inputs stay in this page and are not added to the URL or automatically saved. Optional analytics records fixed action names only after consent, never these amounts or assumptions. Downloading a CSV saves a file only when you choose it.
Your estimate of sale and purchase charges, including spread costs. Deducted from the starting holding, not charged as extra cash. Excludes taxes. Recurring purchase charges come out of the monthly budget.
Reference source loading. Example rates are editable assumptions, not verified current terms.
Values exclude liquidation costs and taxes. Scroll the table horizontally on a phone; the monthly CSV includes all model points.
Year
Cash budget
Keep
Switch
Redirect
What the model does
Keep: the existing holding and each new contribution use the current annual fee.
Switch: subtract the one-off switching cost now, then use the alternative annual fee for the remaining holding and new contributions.
Redirect: keep the existing holding under the current annual fee, but invest new contributions under the alternative annual fee. No initial sale is modelled.
Each month applies a common gross-return factor and an annualised expense factor to the holdings already invested. Contributions arrive at month end, after that month’s fees. Purchase costs are deducted only when a contribution is made. These are simplified expense assumptions; real funds accrue expenses and track Bitcoin differently.
“Cash fees” sums the modelled fund charges, purchase costs and any initial switching cost. It does not include all lost growth or any tax bill. The first month ahead can reverse later when recurring purchase costs differ. This tool compares scenarios, not the merits of the funds.
Why the holding period matters
An expense ratio is charged against fund assets rather than appearing as a separate annual invoice. Its effect compounds: fees slightly reduce the amount left to participate in later gains or losses.
Fees are only one selection factor. Liquidity, bid-ask spread, tracking quality, custody arrangements, tax treatment and account availability can matter more than a few basis points.
This model applies the same assumed gross return to every fund, then deducts its reference expense ratio once per year. Ending value is investment × [(1 + annual return) × (1 − expense ratio)] ^ years. Estimated fee drag is the difference from the same scenario without expenses.
A simple zero-return example
At a hypothetical 0.25% annual expense ratio and zero gross return, $10,000 becomes $9,975 after one year. The $25 difference is a modelled expense, not a prediction of a fund's performance. Over longer periods, lost growth on deducted fees also affects the comparison.
Profiles contain reference rates, not a guarantee of current issuer charges. Temporary waivers, brokerage costs, bid–ask spreads, taxes and tracking differences are outside this calculation. Confirm the fund's current prospectus before relying on a rate.